Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Henderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 5, 2003No. 5D02-2985Published

1Concurrence

SHARP, W., J.,

concurring specially.

I agree this Anders appeal should be affirmed. However, since it is an Anders case, I think our affirmance should expressly state it is without prejudice to seek an appropriate remedy for a sentencing error, which this court has discovered in reviewing the record. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987).

In this case, Henderson was convicted of various second and third degree felonies and received concurrent split sentences of 7 years incarceration followed by 10 years probation.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. CauseySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Capre v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Hayden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API