Legal Opinion
Marjorie Frakes v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1983No. 81-4247PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KASHIWA, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants are tenants of federally-financed housing projects throughout California. They appeal from a judgment of the district court that granted summary judgment for defendants-appellees, the Secretary and other officials of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and two owners of housing projects. We affirm.
Background
Appellants are tenants in housing projects in California that have mortgages insured and subsidized by the federal government pursuant to either Section 221(d)(3) or Section 236 of the National Housing Act (the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Christopher Village, Ltd. Partnership v. RetsinasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- St. Christopher Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Little Earth of United Tribes, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Long v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.