Robinson v. Flint
New York Supreme Court
The complaint is demurred to for two causes. First, that it does not set out a good cause of action, and second, that two different causes of action are improperly united.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, Justice.
The complaint avers sundry contracts made by different persons for furnishing iron to the Sacramento Valley Railroad Company, by which a certain quality of iron was to be furnished at a certain price. The plaintiffs afterwards assumed the contract from the company, provided *241it could be carried out as originally contemplated. They then applied to the defendants to ascertain if the iron originally purchased by the company was still on hand in Boston, and whether the defendants would carry out the contract as originally contemplated. It then avers that the defendants, intending…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nathan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Sargeant v. the State Bank of IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. CortesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Rothchild v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of CanadaNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- Grimshaw v. WoolfallNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
- McInerney v. MainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- McInerney v. MainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.