Legal Opinion

Konda v. Frumpkin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1928No. Docket No. 5069PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

Defendants appeal from the judgment rendered against them in the sum of four hundred dollars for damages suffered by the plaintiff through injury to his automobile bus, occasioned by a collision with an automobile truck belonging to the defendants.

In their brief appellants concede that inasmuch as the evidence on the question of negligence is in marked conflict, the finding of the court on that issue is not subject to review on appeal.

The only ground urged for a reversal of the judgment is that there is no evidence of competent and material character to justify the amount of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rhodes v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Armitage v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Laubscher v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Kruvant v. DickermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. City of Oakland v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API