State v. Goodenough
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred when it determined defendant’s eligibility for alternative incarceration programs (AIPs) and early release under ORS 421.508(4)1 under the statutory framework that governed that determination for offenses committed before January 1, 2009. We conclude that the trial court erred by applying the former statutory framework rather than the current statutory framework, but affirm because defendant was “actively instrumental” in bringing about that error and therefore invited it.
Defendant was convicted of multiple offenses, including…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ZolotoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. Marshall-LauttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. HolycrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. Marshall-LauttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025