Legal Opinion

Flury v. Beeskau

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1934No. Civ. No. 5079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants have appealed from a judgment rendered pursuant to the verdict of a jury, for damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of a collision which occurred at the intersection of two streets in the city of Stockton, between the defendants’ truck and the plaintiff’s bicycle while the latter was attempting to make a left turn.

El Dorado and Channel Streets intersect at a right angle in the business portion of Stockton. El Dorado Street extends north and south and is 56 feet in width with two parallel street-car tracks along the center thereof. Channel Street…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. County of Sonoma v. StofenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Glatz v. Kroeger Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hunt v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. State v. KnutsenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Rannard v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shannon v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Wright v. SniffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. La Fleur v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API