Flury v. Beeskau
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment rendered pursuant to the verdict of a jury, for damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of a collision which occurred at the intersection of two streets in the city of Stockton, between the defendants’ truck and the plaintiff’s bicycle while the latter was attempting to make a left turn.
El Dorado and Channel Streets intersect at a right angle in the business portion of Stockton. El Dorado Street extends north and south and is 56 feet in width with two parallel street-car tracks along the center thereof. Channel Street…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Sonoma v. StofenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Glatz v. Kroeger Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Hunt v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- State v. KnutsenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Rannard v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shannon v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wright v. SniffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- La Fleur v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948