Legal Opinion

Devilbiss v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 3, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County, in Equity. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Sections 4 to 11 of Article 58 of the Code of 1860, have long been part of the law of the State, and have been re-enacted without alteration by the adoption of the recent Code, which is the last expression of the Legislative will upon the subject. Code of 1888, Art. 59, secs. 4 to 11. They provide a mode by which lunatics, and insane persons when tried for or charged with the commission of crime shall he humanely dealt with and treated. They recognize the rule which prevails in all civilized nations that such unfortunate persons ought not to he subject to the same penalties or treatment as…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Manufacturers Trust Co. v. KelbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  4. Deems v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API