Legal Opinion

State v. Poelakker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1967No. 40231PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for burglary in violation of Minn. St. 609.58, subd. 2(3), 1 entered upon Ms plea of guilty.

We affirm the conviction after reviewing the record of the proceedings in light of defendant’s claims 2 that (1) he was illegally arrested and the trial court had no jurisdiction over his person; (2) evidence against him was obtained by means of an illegal search; (3) a confession was obtained by investigating authorities before defendant was provided with counsel or advised of his right of representation, which confession was the product…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Duhn v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Fruhrman v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. State v. KobiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. BoernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API