State v. Poelakker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for burglary in violation of Minn. St. 609.58, subd. 2(3), 1 entered upon Ms plea of guilty.
We affirm the conviction after reviewing the record of the proceedings in light of defendant’s claims 2 that (1) he was illegally arrested and the trial court had no jurisdiction over his person; (2) evidence against him was obtained by means of an illegal search; (3) a confession was obtained by investigating authorities before defendant was provided with counsel or advised of his right of representation, which confession was the product…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Duhn v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Fruhrman v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. KobiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. BoernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968