Legal Opinion

Carroll's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1908No. Appeal, No. 71PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal, No. 71, Oct. T., 1907, by Sinah Jaquay, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., June T., 1906, No. 95, sustaining exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Martha J. Carroll, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts arc stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was decree sustaining exceptions to adjudication.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

This case was presented to the orphans’ court as resting upon two grounds. First, that claimant was the adopted child of the decedent, Martha J. Carroll; and, second, that if she was not an adopted child there had been a contract with decedent for her adoption, under which claimant was *444entitled to recover the proportion, of the estate which would have gone to her had she been duly and regularly adopted. The auditing judge found that while under regular proceedings; in accordance with the statute, in the court of common pleas, the claimant had been adopted by D. W.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham v. Graham's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  2. Kauss v. RohnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Morrison v. Estate of SessionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Butterfield v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ballard v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Schwab Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Collins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. In re Walworth's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
  5. Wall v. Estate of McEnneryWashington Supreme Court · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API