UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dagoberto RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Dagoberto Rodriguez-Lopez (Rodriguez) appeals from his conviction and sentence for drug smuggling. He contends his conviction should be reversed because a statement he made to Customs agents was admitted at trial in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). He also contends he should not have been sentenced to the mandatory minimum for his crime because of the recent enactment of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). We disagree with both contentions, and we affirm.
I
Rodriguez was arrested at the Calexico, California port of entry when Customs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Karl August MostCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ernesto Santana v. United States of America, Ernesto SantanaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie G. MULLANIX, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. SidwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Templeton STOCKDALE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.