Legal Opinion
United States v. Karl August Most
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1986No. 85-5177PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Karl August Most appeals his conviction for conspiracy to import heroin and importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, and 963, conspiracy to possess heroin with the intent to distribute, and two counts of possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), and 846. Appellant contends that the district court erred in denying his motions to suppress all evidence flowing from a Customs mail search of a package containing heroin and certain incriminating statements he made to DEA agents. We affirm.
I
In November…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. James TwineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jerry Alfred WhitworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Sandra Spaise ShirleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Pedro Prieto-VillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ricardo A. BravoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.