McDonald v. Campbell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
Petitioners William McDonald and the Arizona Supreme Court brought this special action requesting us to hold that the real party in interest, the Arizona Personnel Board, has no jurisdiction over petitioners. We accepted jurisdiction of the petition. We now hold that the Personnel Board has no jurisdiction over employment complaints filed by Supreme Court employees.
FACTS
The Defensive Driving Program is a legislatively-created program placed under the supervision of the Arizona Supreme Court. Petitioners employed Phyllis Graham as manager of that program. They subsequently…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beckert v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, District Council 88Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Mann v. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Ahearn v. BaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Arizona Board of Regents v. State Department of AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- McDonald v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- McDonald v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1991