Legal Opinion

Muller v. Nelson, Sherrod & Carter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1978No. 17944PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MASSEY, Chief Justice..

The appellees, individuals and partners of a law firm, and hereinafter referred to merely as Sherrod, sued the appellants, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to in the singular as Phillip, to recover attorney’s fees. From the award of attorney’s fees to Sherrod, Muller appealed.

Judgment is affirmed.

The judgment in favor of Sherrod was by the trial court, sitting without a jury, predicated upon right of recovery under the equitable principle of quantum meruit. We have no doubt of Sherrod’s alternative right to recover under that theory upon some correct…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carroll v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Kawasaki Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. O'Farrill Avila v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Hydrocarbon Management, Inc. v. Tracker Exploration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
  4. Austin Hardwoods, Inc. v. Vanden Berghe, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
  5. 3-D Electric Co. v. Barnett Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API