Muller v. Nelson, Sherrod & Carter
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice..
The appellees, individuals and partners of a law firm, and hereinafter referred to merely as Sherrod, sued the appellants, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to in the singular as Phillip, to recover attorney’s fees. From the award of attorney’s fees to Sherrod, Muller appealed.
Judgment is affirmed.
The judgment in favor of Sherrod was by the trial court, sitting without a jury, predicated upon right of recovery under the equitable principle of quantum meruit. We have no doubt of Sherrod’s alternative right to recover under that theory upon some correct…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carroll v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by38 opinions
- Middleton v. Kawasaki Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- O'Farrill Avila v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Hydrocarbon Management, Inc. v. Tracker Exploration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
- Austin Hardwoods, Inc. v. Vanden Berghe, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- 3-D Electric Co. v. Barnett Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.