Stanzel v. Stanzel

In this action plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring the validity of her marriage to defendant, and this is a motion under section 1169-a of the Civil Practice Act for an order requiring defendant to pay plaintiff’s necessary counsel fee in the action.

It appears that the parties were married in Rochester, New York in 1949; that there are no issue of the marriage; that in January, 1954, this court granted to defendant a judgment of separation against the plaintiff, which of course contains no provision for support of the plaintiff; that defendant remarried in Ohio in September of 1954; and that…