Legal Opinion

Noel v. Noel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1932No. 8 Div. 332PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The appeal is from a decree sustaining a demurrer to the bill. The argument for complainant rests upon the theory that the bill is one to cancel a deed for undue influence, and reliance is had upon the authorities to the effect that in such cases it is not necessary to allege the quo modo by which the undue influence was exerted, but averments in general terms to that effect suffice. Roberts v. Cleveland, 222 Ala. 256, 132 So. 314; Strickland v. Strickland, 206 Ala. 452, 90 So. 345; Mildred Borton v. Frank O. Borton, post, p. 457, 143 So. 468, present term; Cunninghame v. Herring, 195 Ala.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alexander v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Royal v. GossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Stroup v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Cunninghame v. HerringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hardee v. HardeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Abrams v. AbramsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Hinson v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Solomon v. FloWarr Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  5. Buettner Bros. v. Good Hope Missionary Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API