Legal Opinion

Bates Expanded Steel Truss Co. v. Sisters of Mercy of Janesville

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The underlying question which affects the claims of all of the subcontractors and materialmen on this appeal is whether the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, as surety for Krasin Brothers, the principal contractors, is liable for the indebtedness which is owing by Krasin Brothers for labor and materials furnished in erecting a building on premises owned by the Sisters of Mercy, but for which indebtedness there exists no lien or claim for which the owner of the premises is liable. The contract between Krasin Brothers and the owner provided that—

“The contractor shall and will provide all…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Electric Appliance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. United States Gypsum Co. v. GleasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Builders Lumber & Supply Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. R. Connor Co. v. Ætna Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Baumann v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Holland Plastics Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McCormick v. KuhnlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API