Legal Opinion
Pitts v. Helmrich & Payne Drilling
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1999No. 98 CA 1345PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
739 So.2d 335 (1999)
James PITTS
v.
HELMRICH & PAYNE DRILLING.
No. 98 CA 1345.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
June 25, 1999.
Russell C. Monroe, Robert J. Carter, Greensburg, Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant James Pitts.
B. Scott Cowart, Adams and Reese, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, Counsel for Defendant-Appellee Heimrich & Payne Drilling.
Before: LeBLANC, FOGG, and PARRO, JJ.
PARRO, J.
This is a workers' compensation case in which the sole issue on appeal is whether the employee, James Pitts, was within the course and scope of his employment with Helmrich & Payne Drilling (H & P) when his accident…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Williams v. Regional Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Benoit v. Capitol Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Raybol v. Louisiana State UniversitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newman v. Richard Price Const.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Davis v. AMS Tube Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Lewis v. Houma IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Davis v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lanoue v. All Star ChevroletLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.