Legal Opinion
Davis v. AMS Tube Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 2001No. 2000 CA 1311PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UWEIMER, Judge.
This matter is before the court following the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant/employer, AMS Tube Corporation. The workers’ compensation judge found that defendant had fully and completely satisfied its obligation to furnish indemnity and/or medical benefits to its employee, Troy L. Davis, Jr., as of September 10, 1998, the day Mr. Davis was rear-ended in a vehicular accident.
Mr. Davis appealed the judgment listing two assignments of error. The first assignment of error states the court should have denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sanders v. Ashland Oil, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLESupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Walker v. Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity (Rho Chapter)Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Timmons v. SilmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Kennedy v. Johnny F. Smith TruckingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Craig v. Bantek West, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- The Shaw Group v. KulickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sanders v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Davis v. AMS Tube Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Starkey v. Livingston Parish CouncilLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.