Legal Opinion

Benton v. Montgomery Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAjdams, J.

The appellant’s exceptions to the exclusion of evidence must be overruled for the reason that the questions were framed so as to call for answers which would necessarily have embodied a mixed finding of law and fact. Whether the thirty-acre tract or any other was specifically described in the deed was not exclusively a question of fact which the surveyor could determine. What the boundaries are is a matter of law; where they are is a question of fact. Lumber Co. v. Bernhardt, 162 N. C., 460.

The exception chiefly relied on is that which was taken to the charge given the jury; but the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yadkin Lumber Co. v. BernhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Miller v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Carolina & Northwestern Railway Co. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Mayo v. . BlountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1840
  5. Outlaw v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Sheets v. . WalshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Skipper v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Combs v. WoodieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API