Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Tappan & Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 21, 1836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Circuit Court for Jefferson County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

One object of this bill — which was filed by Arthur .Tap-pan & Co. — was to attach in the hands of Eades and Carrico, merchants of Louisville, a debt due from them to Lewis L. Wolf, and to appropriate it to the payment of a debt due from Wolf, who was out of the Commonwealth, to the complainants. The usual restraining order was served upon Eades and Carrico; and after the suit had been proceeding for some time, in the ordinary way, the complainants filed a supplemental bill, in which they suggest that Eades and Carrico are about to become…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Lay v. MyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  3. Roach v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API