Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians v. NGV Gaming, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2008No. 05-17066, 05-17067Published

1DissentN.R. Smith, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent for the following reasons. First, the majority rejects the clear and unambiguous will of Congress in its application of 25 U.S.C. § 81. Second, because of its error in the application of 25 U.S.C. § 81, the majority is thereafter forced to reverse the district court by (1) interpreting contracts that the district court did not review; (2) making its own determination that the contracts were unambiguous; (3) using parol evidence to interpret the contract even though it finds that the contracts were unambiguous; and (4) picking and choosing which parol evidence on which…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API