Legal Opinion

People v. Gallegos

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 11, 2011No. 10SA186, 10SA187, 10SA188, 10SA189, 10SA190PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

In this case, we consolidate five separate interlocutory appeals by the People. All of the defendants were allegedly part of the same conspiracy to distribute illegal nareot-ies, and their arrests resulted from the same set of wiretap orders. The five defendants then joined in a Motion to Suppress Evidence Derived from Illegal Wiretaps, which was subsequently granted by the trial court. Because the appeal concerns the same trial court order granting the motion to suppress as well as the same set of wiretap orders, applications, and affidavits, the facts giving rise to the appeal are identical…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Deherrera v. Decker Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. People ex rel. A.G.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. on v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  4. v. JenningsColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. People v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API