Legal Opinion

Emison v. Catalano

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided January 12, 1996No. 3:95-cv-0617PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JORDAN, District Judge.

This civil action is a constitutional challenge to the Tennessee Campaign Contribution Limits Act of 1995, 1995 Tenn.Pub.Acts, ch. 531. A review of the provisions of the act helps to clarify the issues presented.

The act resulted from House Bill No. 89, substituted for Senate Bill No. 79, and became effective, for the purposes of this civil action, on January 1, 1996. The act enacts Tennessee Code Annotated § 2-10-302, which imposes limits on contributions to any candidate’s campaign by any person, multi-candidate political campaign committee (i.e., a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bay County Democratic Party v. LandDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Bishop v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. EdmondsonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
  3. INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. BECERRADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  4. INTERLINK PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. CROWFOOTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  5. Interlink Products International, Inc. v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API