United States v. Forrester

Judge OHLSON,

with whom Senior Judge ERDMANN joins, dissenting.

The majority does an admirable job of reciting the facts in this case and thus there is no reason to repeat those details here. Suffice it to say that the key takeaway from this ease is that Appellant was convicted at court-martial of multiple specifications of possession of child pornography, and the evidence in support of those specifications consisted of a set of seemingly identical images that appeared on each of four different electronic devices owned by Appellant—two external hard drives, a laptop hard drive, and an…