Legal Opinion

Cupid Diaper Service v. Adelman

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames D. Hopkins, J.

The plaintiff applies for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants, former employees, from soliciting and serving plaintiff’s customers. On October 31, 1960, plaintiff purchased a diaper service business; both defendants had been employees of the business, the defendant Adelman as supervisor-salesman for some four or five years, and the defendant Mund as a routeman-salesman for some seven or eight years. Within two or three days of the purchase, Adelman left plaintiff’s employment voluntarily; within 10 days of the purchase, Mund left plaintiff’s employment voluntarily. Shortly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tabor v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. People's Coat, Apron and Towel Supply Company v. . LightNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. McLean v. HubbardNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Kremer v. KremerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Erik Elec. Co., Inc. v. ElliotDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Inland Rubber Corporation v. Triple a Tire Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. Preferred Electric & Wire Corp. v. KatzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API