Legal Opinion

Ratté v. Forand

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a final decree dismissing the bill after the sustaining of a demurrer. Her case is this. She is the administratrix of the estate of Marie Ratté. In 1927, at the request of the defendants, who are husband and wife, the John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company issued an insurance policy, apparently on the life of Marie Ratté though not so expressly stated, without *186her knowledge, through false representations that the female defendant was a niece of Marie Ratté, and by concealment of the fact that she had an incurable cancer. After her death the defendants collected…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hammons v. HammonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Abbott v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. J. C. Penney Co. v. Schulte Real Estate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Derby v. DerbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Meskell v. MeskellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. Hogan v. HoganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Krokyn v. KrokynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API