Legal Opinion

Allen v. Gates

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 21, 1900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Chancery. Heard on bill, answer, replication and testimony, Chittenden County, March Term, 1900, Taft, Chancellor. Decree that the bill be dismissed. The orator appealed. The bill prayed that the defendants might be enjoined “from removing and interfering with” a certain building, and a temporary injunction was granted in accordance with the prayer of the bill.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

The orator has filed his bill, seeking to restrain the defendants from the removal of a certain building. The defendants made answer, and evidence has been taken. We find that in May, 1889, Leverett F. Englesby and Fred N. Whitney entered into a written agreement by them signed, sealed, and witnessed, but not acknowledged, whereby Whitney leased of Englesby a piece of land 25 feet front by 50 feet deep, on College street in the City of Burlington, for the term of five years ending April x, 1894, at a monthly rent of nine dollars to be paid therefor. The lease contains,, among other things,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. PatteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Hood v. HartshornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Fletcher v. MoreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1843
  4. Smith v. PattonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Canfield v. HardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vermont Marble Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  2. Jeffers v. PeaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  3. Federal Land Bank v. PollenderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Bosley v. BAC Home Loan Servicing L.P. (In Re Bosley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2011
  5. In re Tavern Motor Inn, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API