Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Seven Thousand Two Hundred Forty-six Dollars

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 1, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

This is a civil action under G. L. c. 94C, § 47 (d) (1986 ed.), commenced by the Commonwealth, for forfeiture of $7,246, as proceeds of marihuana sales. Claimants David and Christine Nissenbaum appeal from a judgment that $3,896.02 was subject to forfeiture, and from denial of motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.1 We transferred the case to this court on our own *764motion and now reverse the judge’s order denying claimants’ motion for a directed verdict.

The underlying facts are based on events of March 20, 1981, when a group of ten Federal, State, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. One 1969 Mercedes-Benz AutomobileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Spano v. Wilson Tisdale Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. One 1987 Mercury Cougar AutomobileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. In re United States Currency in the Amount of $315,900.00Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. Fourteen Thousand Two Hundred DollarsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. Fourteen Thousand Two Hundred DollarsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. NegronMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API