Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fourteen Thousand Two Hundred Dollars

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 16, 1994No. 92-P-1625PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

This civil action, seeking an order of forfeiture under G. L. c. 94C, § 47 (¿7), was commenced in 1988. At that time the statute required the Commonwealth to prove “all material facts by a preponderance of the evidence.” The statute was amended by St. 1989, c. 653, § 79, to provide that the “[Commonwealth shall have the burden of proving to the court the existence of probable cause to institute the action. . . .” After trial in 1991, a Superior Court judge concluded that the Commonwealth had sustained its burden of showing that the claimant’s “funds probably were obtained as a result of sales…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. DelaneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Menard v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Fourteen Thousand Two Hundred DollarsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API