Legal Opinion
Lauderdale v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1927No. 8 Div. 483PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrioken, P. J.
This appellant was charged by indictment with a felony. He was entitled to a fair and impartial trial by jury, a trial based upon the law and the evidence in this case. Const. 1901, art. 1, § 6. The following statement of fact, quoted from brief of appellant’s counsel, is borne out by the record:
“When his case was called for trial, the defendant being absent, having sent to the trial judge a certificate from a physician that he was sick and could not attend court, the court issued a bench warrant and ordered the county health officer to accompany the sheriff to the home of the defendant and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Driver v. PateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Holladay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Weaver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Lakey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.