Legal Opinion

Lauderdale v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1927No. 8 Div. 483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrioken, P. J.

This appellant was charged by indictment with a felony. He was entitled to a fair and impartial trial by jury, a trial based upon the law and the evidence in this case. Const. 1901, art. 1, § 6. The following statement of fact, quoted from brief of appellant’s counsel, is borne out by the record:

“When his case was called for trial, the defendant being absent, having sent to the trial judge a certificate from a physician that he was sick and could not attend court, the court issued a bench warrant and ordered the county health officer to accompany the sheriff to the home of the defendant and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Driver v. PateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Holladay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Weaver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Lakey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API