Legal Opinion
Holland v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided May 31, 1991No. CR 89-1042PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
The opinion of this Court issued March 29, 1991, is hereby set aside. The following becomes the opinion of this Court.
William Warren Holland, the appellant in this case, and O'Neal Goodman1 were separately indicted for robbery in the first degree. Their cases were consolidated for trial and both men were convicted. Holland was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole as a habitual felony offender. In addition, he was fined $20,000 and was ordered to pay $10,000 to the victims' compensation fund.
I
On voir dire of the venire, there was no…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stringer v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Levasseur v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ex Parte DobardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Bascom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Gamble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.