Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pullman Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 31, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.Opinion of the Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Affirming.

The only question involved on this appeal is whether a verdict returned upon the first trial for damages should *337be substituted for a verdict returned on a second trial for a less amount, the court having granted a new trial after the first verdict.

Appellant, an infant, was injured while a passenger on one of appellee’s cars, as alleged, because of the negligence of one of its employees. She brought her action for damages in the state court and fixed her damages at $3,000.00, and upon the first trial the jury promptly returned a verdict for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anshutz v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Steinke v. North Vernon Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ashland Dry Goods Co. v. WagesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  2. City of Madisonville v. NisbitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Burton v. Spurlock's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  4. Johnson v. RuleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. Whallen's Executors v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API