Legal Opinion

Van Houten v. Van Winkle

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On bill and demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The object of the bill is to reform one deed and to set aside ■another. The allegations of the bill present the following facts:

The complainant’s father, James Van Blarcom, who was a resident of the city of Paterson, died in the year 1850, intestate, leaving surviving him his widow and four daughters. When he died he was seized of several parcels of real estate in Paterson. Shortly after his death his widow released her dower in his lands to her four daughters. Within a month after this release the daughters, by interchanging deeds, executed by them ■and their respective…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. PyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. RutzlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gimbel v. VeninoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  2. American v. Auto. Assn. of N.J.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API