Legal Opinion
Eames v. Schedler
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 2016No. 2016 CE 1054Published
1Opinion of the CourtWhipple, C.J.
12Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s judgment denying their objection to the candidacy of Kenneth Cutno for the office of United States Representative, Second Congressional District. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Cutno qualified to run for the office of United States Representative, Second Congressional District, on July 21, 2016, by filing a “Notice of Candidacy” form. Cutno signed the form, certifying, among other things, as follows:
9. I acknowledge that I am subject to the provisions of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act if I am a candidate for any…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Landiak v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Cook v. GralikeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.