Legal Opinion
Fredrick Wilhelm, Jr., and Robert Hammermeister v. Associated Container Transportation (Australia) Ltd., and Taylor MacHine Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1981No. 79-4498PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, District Judge.
Longshoremen Wilhelm and Hammermeister appeal from the dismissal of their product liability claim against the vessel owner Associated Container Transportation (Australia), Ltd., (Associated), and from the denial of their motion for new trial. The district court concluded the product liability claim against Associated was proscribed by 38 U.S.C. § 905 and found that the jury verdict in favor of Associated and Taylor Machine Works was not against the clear weight of the evidence and did not work any miscarriage of justice. We affirm.
The Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Daniel Ramos Rios v. Empresas Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, Etc., and Third-Party v. Fred Imbert, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Lauro De Los Santos v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., Seattle Stevedore Co., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Peacock v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by23 opinions
- Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- United States v. 4.0 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Sara Dees v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Roy v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,768 Eugene Bilderbeck v. World Wide Shipping Agency, a Corporation, Frankolyn Shipping, Ltd Star Shipping A/sCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.