Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,768 Eugene Bilderbeck v. World Wide Shipping Agency, a Corporation, Frankolyn Shipping, Ltd Star Shipping A/s

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1985No. 84-2580PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

Eugene Bilderbeck, an injured longshoreman, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant shipowners. The district court granted summary judgment after striking from Bilderbeck’s pleading his allegations of liability based on a theory that the shipowner had placed on the market or in the workplace a dangerously defective product (ship). We affirm.

In 1972, Congress amended the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901, et seq., to foreclose a shipowner’s previous “no fault” liability based on a theory of unseaworthiness or nondelegable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fredrick Wilhelm, Jr., and Robert Hammermeister v. Associated Container Transportation (Australia) Ltd., and Taylor MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Dianne Sutherland, United States of America v. Alan W. FiniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Delange v. Dutra Construction, Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Delange v. Dutra Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Anastasiou v. M/T WORLD TRUSTDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  5. Salvato v. Hakko Maritime Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API