Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ziemba

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 21, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The basic issue in this proceeding concerns the status of the petitioner as a person authorized to maintain a proceeding for a compulsory accounting against an executrix. The facts present an apparently novel situation, and, so far as the court deems them material, they are wholly undisputed.

The present decedent died on August 29, 1931, survived by a widow and eight children, four girls and four boys, of whom the latter were all infants, the eldest of the boys, Peter, having been bom on June 29, 1914. His will, which was admitted to probate on November 13, 1931, purported to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Beardsley v. . HotchkissNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Bool v. MixNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Fonda v. Van HorneNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  5. In re MeekerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ScheckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of MuellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  3. In re the Estate of ZalewskiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  4. In re the Estate of DonnellyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  5. In re the Estate of McCulloughNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API