Legal Opinion

Ross v. Scott

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM MORGAN. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Wartburg. D. K. Young, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

On May 10, 1882, the defendant, Kussell, claiming the land in controversy under a written instrument of sale purporting to have been executed by Patsey J. Galbraith, on March 2, 1871, undertook to sell the land to the defendant, Scott, by assigning to him the instrument of sale, and making him a deed to the land. The defendant, Scott, caused the assignment,, with the instrument attached, and the deed to be duly registered about a month after he received them. On *481August 4, 1882, the bill in this cause was filed by the complainant as the rightful owner of the land, under conveyances which are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Cone Iron WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Weymouth v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Ward v. Carson River Wood Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Goller v. FettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Uhlhorn v. KeltnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  2. Cathcart v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API