Legal Opinion · Dissent

Charles D. Scanio v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 11, 1994No. 1733, Docket 94-2002Published

1DissentPierce, Circuit Judge

This is a case concerning jurisdiction and it necessarily implicates the right of access to the courts. In my view, the majority has given an incorrect and needlessly narrow interpretation to applicable principles, with the result that appellant will be denied his day in court. I respectfully disagree and dissent.

Scanio was prosecuted in the Western District of New York for structuring a currency transaction in violation of 31 U.S.C. §§ 5324(3) and 5322(a). After trial by jury, he was convicted and sentenced to a one year term of imprisonment and two. years of supervised release. Scanio…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API