Legal Opinion

State v. Riner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 17, 1971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction for possession of narcotics. ORS 474.020. Defendant contends that evidence that he had narcotics in his possession should have been suppressed because (1) he was arrested on a pretext, and (2) he was not immediately taken before a magistrate pursuant to ORS 133.550.

Defendant, driving an automobile with a California license, stayed overnight at a Lebanon motel. The motel operator reported to the Lebanon police department that the defendant had a gun in his vehicle which was thought to be illegal. There was also a report from an apparently unreliable source…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Quirk v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. WhitewaterOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. FloranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. GwinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. SorgenfreiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. State v. KangiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API