Legal Opinion

Pena v. Pena (Child Custody)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2014No. 62504Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

custody. NRS 1250.150's meaning, scope, and application to the district court's custody determinations are issues of law that we review de novo. Arguello v. Sunset Station, Inc., 127 Nev. , , 252 P.3d 206, 208 (2011). NRS 1250.150 states: "Deployment or the potential for future deployment must not, by itself, constitute a substantial change in circumstances sufficient to warrant a permanent modification of a custody or visitation order." NRS 1250.150 (2011) (repealed 2013) (emphasis added). In interpreting NRS 1250.150, the ultimate goal is to effectuate the Legislature's intent. See Cromer…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ellis v. CarucciNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rico v. RodriguezNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Cromer v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Lloyd v. ButtsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor CommissionerNevada Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API