Legal Opinion
United States v. Angulo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 15, 1993No. Nos. 92-10178, 92-10183, 92-10221, 92-10254PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Joel and Octavio Angulo, Fidel Vargas and Jaime Limdn were convicted following a second jury trial1 for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and/or heroin and for possession with intent to distribute cocaine and/or heroin in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We now remand to the district court for an evidentiary hearing relating to the defendants’ motion for mistrial based upon claims of jury tampering. We find no merit to the other claims raised on appeal.
Limón asserts several evidentiary errors. These arguments are without merit.2 We also find no merit in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Raul Lopez-AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Richard AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Larry David Davis v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Solomon Bitton Simtob, United States of America v. Solomon Bitton Simtob, AKA Simon SimtobCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Craig ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Steven Ray LAWSON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert G. BORG, Warden, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.