Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1923No. 22152PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

Plaintiff, as alleged, was driving east in an automobile on a highway about five miles west of Lincoln. The highway is a continuation of west O street, one of Lincoln’s main business thoroughfares, and is a part of the road then known as the Omaha, Lincoln and Denver highway. The highway is paved for about eight miles west of the city, and at a point about five miles west of the corporate limits it intersects a crossing of defendant railroad. In 1918 the railroad tracks Avere elevated several feet at the street intersection and a railroad bridge Avas constructed by the company over the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. SebenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Chisholm v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Gould v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Corcoran v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuska v. Nichols Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Frickel v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Huber v. Cornhusker Paving Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District v. BoettcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. County of Red WillowNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API