Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartford Fire Insurance v. County of Red Willow

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1947No. 32265Published

1DissentSimmons, C. J.

I dissent. The defendant presents and argues three questions. These must be answered contrary to defendant’s contentions if the judgment of the trial court is to be affirmed. The majority neither mentions nor answers two of the questions. The answer given to one is erroneous in my opinion.

Plaintiff alleged that the car involved in this accident was being driven with due care and under proper control when it was “thrown and precipitated” into a hole in the road which was “completely hidden” from the sight and view; that the defendant county had notice or with the exercise of reasonable…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grantham v. Watson Bros. TransportationNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Meyer v. Platte Valley Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Tite v. Omaha Coliseum Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Fairman v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Klement v. LindellNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API