Legal Opinion

Malyutin v. Rice

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 30, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2009-0093Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) ALEKSANDR MALYUTIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-93 (EGS) ) CONDOLEEZZA RICE et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because proceeding on this complaint would require judicial review of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API