Legal Opinion

State v. Bunker

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to county court, Brown county. Hon. J. E. Adams, Judge. Ernest I. Bunker, having been convicted of bastardy, brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion. A proceeding for bastardy is in the nature of a civil action to enforce the performance of a civil and moral obligation, and is not a criminal action.

Read the full summary

Error to county court, Brown county. Hon. J. E. Adams, Judge. Ernest I. Bunker, having been convicted of bastardy, brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion. A proceeding for bastardy is in the nature of a civil action to enforce the performance of a civil and moral obligation, and is not a criminal action. Jones v. State, 14 N. W. 901; Cottrell v. State, 1 Id. 1008; Kremlin v. Lallman, 20 Id. 383; Altschulen v. Algaza, 21 Id. 401; Hutchinson v. State, 27 N. W. 115; Ingram v. State, 37 Id. 944; Stuckler v. Gross, 49 Id. 804; State v. Worthingham, 23 Minn., 528; State v. Becht, Id. 1;…

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This was a prosecution brought in the name of the state, on the relation of Amy Mabel Weed, against the defendant, under the bastardy act of 1893. The jury found the issues for the state, and the defendant brings the case here for review on writ of error.

The first question presented is the constitutionality of the law. It is contended by counsel for plaintiff in error that the law conferring jurisdiction upon county courts in this class of cases is unconstitutional. This question was presented and determined by this court at the present term, in the case of State v. Scott, 65 N. W. 31. That…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Rea v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Gut v. StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. State v. ReddingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. Mitchell Power Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. WintersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Mathews v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Schwoebel v. FuginaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  5. T. W. Child & Co. v. JenkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API