Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Hanson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Sargent county; Allen, J. Action by J. L. Mathews against Anna M. Hanson. There was a directed verdict for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCarmody, J.

This action is in claim and delivery to recover possession of a building situated upon lot 3, section 27, township 129, range 53, in Sargent county, N. D., known as a creamery. The answer is a general denial. At the close of all the testimony the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. From an order denying a motion for a new trilal defendant appeals to this court.

The facts are as follows: On the 9th day of August, 1897, one Louis Hanson, also known as Lars Hanson and L. M. Hanson, filed a homestead entry on lots 1, 2, 3, and é of section 27, township 129, range 53, in South…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rea v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Myrick v. BillSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1883
  3. Minnesota Debenture Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Gage v. GoudyIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dunham Lumber Co. v. GreszNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Strobel v. Northwest G. F. Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Kittelson v. ColletteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Newell v. McMurrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Coverston v. EgelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API