Legal Opinion

Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 21, 1926No. 5362PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. Any disabled or indigent soldier of the late European war, who is a resident of this State, may peddle or conduct business in any town or city thereof, except peddling or dealing in ardent and intoxicating drinks, running a billiard, pool, or other table of like character, dealing in futures, peddling stoves or clocks, carrying on the business of a pawnbroker or auctioneer, or dealing in lightning-rods, without • paying any license fee for the privilege of so doing; and a certificate from the ordinary of the county, stating the facts of his being such disabled or indigent soldier, shall be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartfield v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Coxwell v. GoddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. KirkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. City of Marietta v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Dasher v. City of ValdostaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Allen v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. City of Reynolds v. De FravioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API