Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. Any disabled or indigent soldier of the late European war, who is a resident of this State, may peddle or conduct business in any town or city thereof, except peddling or dealing in ardent and intoxicating drinks, running a billiard, pool, or other table of like character, dealing in futures, peddling stoves or clocks, carrying on the business of a pawnbroker or auctioneer, or dealing in lightning-rods, without • paying any license fee for the privilege of so doing; and a certificate from the ordinary of the county, stating the facts of his being such disabled or indigent soldier, shall be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartfield v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Coxwell v. GoddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. KirkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- City of Marietta v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Dasher v. City of ValdostaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Allen v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- City of Reynolds v. De FravioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.