City of Marietta v. Brantley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
The Civil Code, § 1888, as amended by the act of 1918 (Ga. Laws 1918, p. 11(5) and the act of 1919 (Ga. Laws 1919, pp. 90, 91), reads as follows: “Any' disabled or indigent Confederate soldier or soldiers of the Seminole, Creek, or Cherokee Indian War, or Mexican War, Spanish-American War, or late European War, or blind person, who is a resident of this State, may peddle or conduct business in any town, city, county or counties thereof without paying license for the privilege of so doing; and a certificate from the ordinary of any count}', stating the facts of his being such disabled or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. Gate City Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- White v. North Georgia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- City of Macon v. SamplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Mayor of Moultrie v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Moss v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Corley v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Bowden v. Georgia Public Service CommissonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Hornsby v. BristowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Kelly v. City of JeffersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- City of Newnan v. Atlanta Laundries Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.