Legal Opinion

City of Marietta v. Brantley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1930No. 7280PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

The Civil Code, § 1888, as amended by the act of 1918 (Ga. Laws 1918, p. 11(5) and the act of 1919 (Ga. Laws 1919, pp. 90, 91), reads as follows: “Any' disabled or indigent Confederate soldier or soldiers of the Seminole, Creek, or Cherokee Indian War, or Mexican War, Spanish-American War, or late European War, or blind person, who is a resident of this State, may peddle or conduct business in any town, city, county or counties thereof without paying license for the privilege of so doing; and a certificate from the ordinary of any count}', stating the facts of his being such disabled or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. Gate City Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. White v. North Georgia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. City of Macon v. SamplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Mayor of Moultrie v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Moss v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Corley v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Bowden v. Georgia Public Service CommissonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Hornsby v. BristowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Kelly v. City of JeffersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. City of Newnan v. Atlanta Laundries Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API