Legal Opinion

Stivers v. Ritt

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, James S. Ritt, from orders made in the Municipal Court of the city of ¡New York, sixth district, borough of Manhattan, opening a default.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventbitt, J.

The defendant-appellant was sued as the indorser of a promissory note. On the return day of the summons he interposed a demurrer, which was forthwith overruled, leave, however, being given to answer over. • The defendant suffered a default judgment to be entered and then made an application to have the default opened and set aside. This was granted and an order was entered thereon dated the 21st day of April, 1899, requiring as a condition the payment of ten dollars costs and the deposit in court of the amount of the judgment rendered against the defendant-appellant. The order did not recite…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pfeffer v. Buffalo Railway Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  2. Colwell v. DevlinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  3. Schwartz v. SchendelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  4. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co. v. CatharineNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Popkin v. FriedlanderAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurd v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Cahill v. LilienthalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900
  3. Lerner v. WagnerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  4. Lerner v. WagnerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API